Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Jammu & Kashmir and it's Problem

(Note: In the following article the word “state” means government i.e., state government, central government and all their institutions like army, J&K police,..)

Jammu and Kashmir though not acknowledged by Government of India is always a place of contention. Waves of violence erupt every now and then. Legally J&K is part of India but these acts of violence are trying to decrease the legitimacy of government of India as most of these violence are against institutions of government like police, army, etc,.

State trapped

J&K houses a large number of anti state elements who try to trap the state(government). In fact state(government) is trapped many times resulting ire of citizens. Huge presence of army and the special powers it has in some regions trough AFSPA (Armed Forces Special Powers Act) is deterring the anti national activists a free movement. They want to weaken the state institutions and nullify the presence of army. The army which almost has omnipotent powers owing to AFSPA, during its discharge of duties made some arbitrary actions against common people. So because of AFSPA the security forces misused the power and this led to confrontation between government and citizens. The draconian AFSPA has not only created a trouble in J&K but also created a lot of trouble in all north-eastern states. This AFSPA is the reason for development of hatred against the government. So AFSPA itself is acting against the government.* Anti national elements like hizbul mujahideen, lashkar-e-taiba took this as an advantage and started to claim that all the actions done by army as arbitrary and they projected army as an evil to common man in J&K. Their voices gained legitimacy when some excesses made by army came into light. People agitated, pelted stones, burnt infrastructure in opposition to the acts of state(government) perceiving all of them to be illegitimate. Security forces retaliated against the agitators in a belief that all the violence can be curtailed by force. This led to death of many citizens mainly youth. This gave a chance to the anti national elements and anti state elements to gain more followers as state is seen curbing the liberty of people. As John Locke says “You can intimidate people into doing things but not believing them”, the state failed to regain legitimacy from all corners of the society. Various investigation and interrogations made by the security forces against anti state elements, its supporters and sometimes common people has led to a belief that security forces are entering into the liberty of common people.  These activities of the state gave popularity to anti national element like Burhan Wani. It is not that he did good for the people but it is the failure of the state to do good for the people has made him hero. These anti national elements and anti state elements successfully trapped the government by making it act against the people. This is decrease the legitimacy of government over citizens of J&K and this is what they need.

Wicked problem

It is a wicked problem for the state. If state decreases the presence of security forces or repeals AFSPA, the anti state elements gain momentum and they will have a free road to violence where ever they wish. This is a threat to whole nation.
        If state continues to govern by force, then anti state elements and anti national elements gain people’s legitimacy. Then the dead terrorists will continue to be called as martyrs. The state will lose its legitimacy. Either of the ways gives an advantage to the anti national elements and good governance is the only solution. Good governance can only be achieved when people believe they have enough liberty. Liberty cannot coexist with AFSPA.*

Sunday, July 3, 2016

Need of Centralized transportation system

Delhi, the capital city of India adds up thousands of people daily which is already congested with 11267 people per square km.  Two years ago WHO quoted Delhi’s air as dirtiest. Delhi metro is successful in reducing the vehicular air pollution to a large extent apart from decreasing the travel time.  Delhi metro (DMRC) is owned by both government of India and government of Delhi in equal proportions. Delhi also has a robust bus transport system owned by Delhi Transport Corporation with the largest fleet of CNG fuelled buses in the world.  Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) is a subsidiary of government of Delhi.

Competitive transportation systems
                There is a difference of fares between these two transport systems. In some routes DTC runs buses in parallel to metro. So it is giving people to board a polluted route when an unpolluted route is available. DTC which is also a transportation company as DMRC competes with DMRC in some routes. Metro has the advantages of quick travel, least pollution, decreases congestion and less waiting time should be given the priority. We have different fare systems for metro and buses. A regular traveler who is living more than a kilometer from a metro is now choosing to travel by bus his complete journey so that he need not pay fares separately for both. This is one reason why people travel in buses for far distances also even when a metro is available which adds to green house emissions as buses are not as efficient as metros and lead to congestion in city.

Priority intervention: Need Co-operative transportation systems
                Buses should be a supporting transport to metro and fly from metro stations to the areas which are not served by metro. A passenger must be able to board a bus to metro station, travel by metro and reach his destination by bus from metro station with single travel card or account. Two transportation systems and others if any have to make a centralized tariff mechanism and charge the passenger only once in a day proportional to the total distance travelled by him throughout the day at the end of the day from his prepaid travel card or account.

Consequences: Reduction in green house gases
                With Co-operative transportation systems it will become easier for the people to move from one place to another through public transport system. As Vehicular pollution is registering a growth of 14% per annum in Delhi, due to highest number of registered cars compared to any other metropolitan city of India. Public transport will have much lesser carbon emission per person per kilometer compared to a four wheeler car in which generally only one person travel despite its capacity to carry four or more. The solution lies in encouraging and educating people by giving better, faster, safer and easier public transportation compared to the four wheeler which plies on congested roads, accident prone, needs attentive driving.



References

Cars running on corpse

                   Automobile industry which accounts for 7.1% of country’s GDP, is a major contributor of growth and development of the nation. As India is a developing country daily more people come into higher income category and these people buy vehicles. It is their liberty to have a luxurious life. It is also helping nation by creating more jobs, giving more tax to the government, keeping economic growth ticking.  In Delhi, Vehicular pollution is registering a growth of 14% per annum on the other hand. This vehicular pollution is leading to poor air quality and has many carcinogenic affects as well. This is in turn making the city a heat island. 

                   Cars add up every day and trees don’t add up every day. Pollution adds up every day and pollution control is not adding up every day. So, it is leading to high growth of pollution in the city daily. This makes up a super wicked problem where we cannot compromise on either ends.  The higher pollution in Delhi is actually decreasing life expectancy by6.4 years. The rich who always live under air-conditioned rooms will be less effected and have better access to medical facilities. It is in fact poor who are badly affected and I guess life expectancy of poor in Delhi goes down by 10 years at least.

                   Unless this problem is answered this it affects the large section of people directly and create a problem to rest of the areas as well. Many rules are brought up by the government and national green tribunal like odd-even scheme which allows odd numbered cars on odd dates and even numbered cars on even dates for partial period and banning sales of diesel vehicles which pollute much higher compared to petrol variants.  

                   We cannot go with any of the extremes. I prefer a mid way tilted towards environmentalism as Industry is already enjoying huge benefits. I feel public transport needs to be revitalized and be made in such a manner that if rich can travel in it with pride by decreasing their four wheeler travelling it vastly decreases pollution. The governments are already in this way but the progress is much less compared to the growing problem. Public transport will have much lesser carbon emission per person per kilometer compared to a four wheeler car in which generally only one person travel despite its capacity to carry four or more. Encouraging Public transport is the only solution I feel in this high economically growing city.